Home / Reports / Most-Used Scraping Actors Right Now

Most-Used Scraping Actors Right Now (October 2026)

Last updated: October 21, 2026 · Data snapshot: October 21, 2026 (trailing 30-day window) · Weekly refresh

222,295,388total runs/30d across 2,992 scraping Actors
42.0%of all runs go to the top 10 Actors
18,171,771#1: apify/instagram-scraper
12,985runs/user, most API-like usage

Table 1 — Top 20 by 30-day run volume

#Actor^Runs/30d^Fail rate^Users/30d^Runs/user^$/1k (list)
1apify/instagram-scraper18,171,7710.01%55,041330—
2clockworks/tiktok-scraper14,114,4290.90%29,205483—
3compass/Google-Maps-Reviews-Scraper12,789,6020.20%8,1161,576—
4apify/instagram-profile-scraper ↗9,638,2450.00%35,747270—
5harvestapi/linkedin-profile-scraper8,462,7570.00%13,691618$4.00
6apify/google-search-scraper8,011,3450.00%23,643339—
7apify/instagram-post-scraper ↗6,284,5930.00%16,691377—
8danek/twitter-scraper5,856,4210.00%45112,985—
9apify/facebook-posts-scraper5,488,4530.00%16,586331—
10apify/instagram-reel-scraper ↗4,449,0850.00%18,881236—
11apidojo/tweet-scraper4,346,8790.00%9,411462—
12compass/crawler-google-places4,244,8811.86%43,55097—
13scraperlink/google-search-results-serp-scraper ↗4,166,2820.00%2,1151,970$0.50
14harvestapi/linkedin-profile-posts ↗3,656,5180.00%11,714312—
15clockworks/tiktok-comments-scraper ↗3,526,4440.15%5,319663—
16apify/facebook-pages-scraper ↗3,348,0130.01%7,592441—
17apify/website-content-crawler3,332,4870.25%13,455248—
18clockworks/tiktok-profile-scraper ↗2,879,3720.56%8,471340—
19kaitoeasyapi/twitter-x-data-tweet-scraper-pay-per-result-cheapest ↗2,668,4920.00%5,209512—
20streamers/youtube-scraper2,667,3450.38%14,395185—

Table 2 — Runs-per-user: where scraping looks like an API, not a tool

Actors with ≥50 monthly users, ranked by runs per user. High intensity = few users hammering it in production (API-like); low intensity = many casual users.

Actor^Runs/30d^Users/30d^Runs/user (intensity)
danek/twitter-scraper5,856,42145112,985
curious_coder/onlyfans-scraper ↗639,9255711,227
epctex/pinterest-scraper ↗1,208,7312275,325
web_wanderer/yelp-reviews-scraper ↗1,280,8132644,852
scraping_solutions/linkedin-profile-comments-reactions-scraper-no-cookies ↗201,681563,601

Key findings

How we measure

Cohort: Actors scanned from the public Apify Store API (popularity-sorted top 3,957, 3,032 scraping-related matches) on 2026-10-20. For each Actor we take publicActorRunStats30Days: TOTAL, SUCCEEDED, FAILED, ABORTED, TIMED-OUT over the trailing 30 days. Failure rate = FAILED / TOTAL — a run the user cancelled (ABORTED) or that exceeded its timeout budget (TIMED-OUT) is not counted as a failure; both are small relative to TOTAL in this cohort.

Ranking uses TOTAL runs over the trailing 30 days from the public Store API. "Users" = distinct accounts that started a run in the same window. Runs/user is a rough intensity proxy (one user may run many small jobs, or one huge job may contain many internal runs).

Failures have many causes (bad input, target changes, platform incidents) — a high failure rate is a signal, not a verdict. Small-sample Actors (under ~1,000 runs) are excluded from rankings. License: CC BY 4.0 — cite TopScraper with the data snapshot date.

Conclusion

If you are choosing infrastructure by popularity, the data says: social media scraping is a solved, hyper-scaled problem on the Apify Store (Instagram/TikTok tooling alone accounts for tens of millions of runs a month), and popularity is a reasonable proxy for maintenance — the top 20 all sit at or below ~2% failure. The inverse signal is intensity: Actors with extreme runs-per-user are de-facto production APIs with fragile single-vendor dependence — check their maintenance recency in our abandonment report before you build on one.